Key Relationship Facts
The Perron family—the family of five girls from Harrisville, Rhode Island, featured in the film The Conjuring—were clients of Ed and Lorraine Warren, not blood relatives or members of the Warrens’ extended family. Public records of the Warrens’ paranormal investigations list the Perron case as one of their notable cases; there is no evidence in court, investigative, or news sources of a familial tie between the Warrens and the Perrons beyond their client–investigator relationship. Claims of shared ancestry, marriages between the families, or joint business ventures are not supported by primary documents and should be treated as speculative.
Background on Ed and Lorraine Warren
Ed Warren (1926–2006) and Lorraine Warren (née Moran, 1927–2019) were self-described paranormal investigators based in Connecticut. They founded the New England Society for Psychic Research and, over a career spanning decades, built a public profile through books, lectures, and consultation on reported hauntings. While respected by some in the paranormal community, their methods and evidence were and remain controversial within scientific and legal communities. Sources such as newspaper archives, library holdings, and published case summaries document their work and list case details.
The Perron Family Case: Timeline and Context
Facts of the Case
| Attribute | Verified Detail | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Family Name | Perron | Court and news records |
| Location | Harrisville, Rhode Island | Property records, historical maps |
| Reported Phenomena Period | 1970s | Investigative files, published accounts |
| Investigators Involved | Ed and Lorraine Warren | Warren case notes, interviews |
| Public Exposure | 1980s books and media | Bibliographic and media archives |
The Perron family reported unusual events in their home during the 1970s and engaged the Warrens to investigate. The case attracted renewed attention after the 2013 film depiction, but the core facts—five daughters, a rural farmhouse, and a decades-long family experience of unsettling events—remain anchored in period interviews and municipal records.
Common Misconceptions and Speculation
Because the Warrens’ names are strongly associated with high-profile cases, some narratives blur boundaries between professional involvement and personal connection. Claims that Ed and Lorraine Warren were related to, married into, or formally partnered in business with the Perrons do not align with publicly available primary documents. When evaluating such claims, rely on court filings, investigative reports, and contemporaneous news rather than anecdotal retellings.
How to Assess Similar Claims
- Prioritize primary records: property deeds, court filings, and contemporaneous news articles over later summaries.
- Distinguish client relationships from family ties; investigators can be close to a family without any biological or marital connection.
- Check source provenance: books and documentaries may dramatize connections for narrative impact.
- Corroborate across multiple independent sources to reduce reliance on single-author accounts.
- Use digital archives and library databases to locate original timelines and statements.
Reliable Source Types for Verification
For questions about individuals and families in paranormal or investigative contexts, prioritize records that are independently verifiable: municipal and county archives for location data, newspaper libraries for contemporaneous reporting, and authorized repositories for case files. Cross-reference claims against more than one source type to reduce the influence on interpretation and minimize the spread of unverified detail.
Relationship Summary and Guidance
Ed and Lorraine Warren and the Perron family were connected through a client–investigator relationship central to one of the better-documented haunting cases in modern paranormal history. There is no verified evidence of familial or business ties between the Warrens and the Perrons beyond this professional engagement. For long-term clarity, treat the relationship as that of investigators and clients, and apply the verification practices above when assessing similar assertions in the future.